What can the user support?
Profile evidence is compared with stated requirements, responsibilities, preferred qualifications, and leadership expectations.
Forge is built around a simple principle: matching a résumé to a job title is not enough. Useful career intelligence must consider demonstrated capability, practical constraints, and the value of the move.
Forge organizes available information into distinct questions so users can understand the reasoning, limitations, and tradeoffs behind an opportunity.
Profile evidence is compared with stated requirements, responsibilities, preferred qualifications, and leadership expectations.
Compensation, location, work arrangement, timing, and other saved constraints help identify practical conflicts.
Described responsibilities and development opportunities are considered against the user’s destination. A related title supports discovery but does not prove access to growth or guarantee advancement.
Job postings can be incomplete, outdated, duplicated, or imprecise. User profiles may also omit relevant accomplishments. Forge therefore presents scores as decision support and pairs them with explanations, concerns, and missing information.
Forge does not promise interviews, offers, promotions, or compensation outcomes. Human hiring decisions and workplace realities include factors that no public job description or profile can fully capture.
Undisclosed compensation and unverified commute details remain unknown. They appear as questions to resolve; available information coverage is shown separately from alignment.
No. Forge serves job seekers and provides career decision support. Employers make their own independent hiring decisions.
The current matcher combines capability, described career contribution, and known practical compatibility. Unknown dimensions are excluded and the available weights normalized. Deep Dives explain the saved assessment without replacing its score. Evidence support and profile completeness remain separate.
No. Forge can identify some missing or conflicting information, but users should verify important details with the original employer source.
Capability, practical compatibility, career contribution, and information coverage answer distinct questions. AIR evidence starts as self-reported; additional source labels require staff review. Roadmap activities, evidence submission, and review are tracked separately. Voluntary follow-up feedback supports a methodology pilot; it does not yet establish effectiveness.